LogoLogo
Savimbo homepageBuy creditsSpanish
  • Executive summary
  • Front Material
    • Contents
    • Index of figures
    • Index of tables
    • Acronyms and abbreviations
    • Terms and definitions
  • Getting started
  • Introduction
    • The urgency of targeted biodiversity conservation
    • Simplicity, complexity theory, and biodiversity
    • Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and local communities by design
    • Biodiversity methodology benefits
  • Overall description
    • Objectives
    • Scope
    • Limitations
  • Project description
    • Principles
      • Principles of working with IP
    • Eligibility criteria
      • Land ownership and law
    • Additionality
    • Project boundaries
      • Spatial limits of the BCP
      • Temporal limits of the BCP
      • Grouped projects
    • Implementation plan
      • Measurement approaches
      • Indicator species observations
      • Risks and uncertainty
    • Effective participation
      • Community involvement
      • Capacity for action
      • Financial transparency
      • Safeguards checklist
  • Calculation
    • Unit calculations
    • Area calculations
    • Time calculations
    • Integrity calculations
    • Value calculations
  • Baseline assessment
    • Baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Analysis of agents and drivers of biodiversity loss
    • Baseline biodiversity (optional)
    • Baseline risk of biodiversity loss
    • Indicator species selection
    • Indicator species integrity score
  • SDG contributions
  • Monitoring plan
    • Monitoring report
    • Additional monitoring requirements
  • Authors
  • References
  • Appendices
    • Appendix A: Biodiversity methodologies comparison table
    • Appendix B: Sample legal proof of land control
    • Appendix C: Sample baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Appendix D: Species categorization of richness
    • Appendix E: Sample selection of indicator species
    • Appendix F: Sample indicator-species observations
    • Appendix G: Sample open-source code and calculation
    • Appendix H: Indigenous authors
    • Appendix I: Letters of support
      • Fernando Ayerbe, Ornithology
      • Ned Hording, Biodiversity
      • Olber Llanos, Zoologist
      • Mike McColm, Ethnology
      • Peter Thomas, Anthropologist
      • Jesús Argente, Marine biology
      • Sara Andreotti, Marine Biologist
      • Carolina Romero, Lawyer.
      • Daniel Urbano, Herpetologist
      • Ramesh Boonratana PhD, Primatologist
      • Theodore Schmitt, Conservationists
      • Anja Hutschenreiter, Ecologist and Tropical Conservationist
      • Miguel Chindoy, Indigenous leader
    • Appendix J: Sample uses of biodiversity unit
    • Appendix K: How to do FPIC
    • Appendix L: Independent Expert Panel Checklist
    • Appendix M: How to calculate a biodiversity credit by hand
    • Appendix N: How to calculate home ranges
    • Appendix O: How to calculate integrity scores
  • Document history
  • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • LinkedIn

About Savimbo

  • Science
  • Buy credits
  • About us
  • Donate

Indigenous authors

  • Jhony Lopez
  • Fernando Lezama
  • Blog

© 2023 Savimbo Inc. All rights reserved.

On this page

Was this helpful?

Executive summary

Conservation-first, indicator-species-based biodiversity crediting

NextFront Material

Last updated 9 months ago

Was this helpful?

This methodology has been designed for simplicity and rapid deployment. It was co-developed with Indigenous Peoples (IP) and local communities (LC) involved in grassroots conservation in the Colombian Amazon, then translated to global markets by a dedicated core of conservation scientists for the immediate use of like-groups.

Indigenous Peoples steward an estimated on Earth and yet recieve This methodology is specifically designed to eliminate the scientific bureaucracy and market middlemen that could siphon money out of the commercialization of this service. Instead, it enables immediate and autonomous quantification and direct payments to these groups and their smallfarmer neighbors.

This methodology relies on indicator species. A simple but powerful concept: certain species of flora and fauna can survive only in functional ecosystems. A healthy specimen in the wild is a scientifically valid indicator that the ecosystem is functionally intact. Proving the existence of indicator species using non-invasive monitoring techniques (such as game cameras, photographs, or audio recordings), respects the wildlife and can be easily, and immediately implemented on the ground by IP and LC groups within traditional hunter-gatherer contexts. This is practical, useful, and valid given the difficulties of knowing or monitoring the fauna and flora of large ecosystems like the Amazon, and thanks to recent , it is demonstrated that species diversity in one taxonomic group may be sufficient to represent other aspects of biodiversity. (); (); ().

This methodology issues voluntary biodiversity credits (VBCs). As such, it can never be used to provide “offsets” of any kind. Its authors do not believe that it will ever be ethical to trade a , or one IP group's jaguar for another's.

This methodology has been intentionally simplified. The scientists who have promoted it have used their expertise to democratize the measurements required for market inclusion, not in the name of scientific advancement, but in the name of immediate action.

Figure 1. One year of data loaded to open source code for biodiversity credit calculations

To the clear aim of direct market access for IP and LC, we have intentionally omitted the following scientific quantification methods:

  • Identification of individuals of an indicator species, or calculations of population change,

  • eDNA or other sophisticated scientific methods of biodiversity characterization,

  • Ecosystem or habitat quantification at a project level,

  • Species richness metrics at a project level.

We acknowledge that these compromises may mean lower market values for the VBCs issued under this standard and consider it an acceptable tradeoff for omitting scientific standards which are exclusionary to the people we directly seek to incentivize.

This methodology was designed for behavior change. IP and LC can preserve or traffick rare species. They have unrestricted access to hunt or study the rarest and most valuable species on earth. They have traditional knowledge that far exceeds our best botanical and behavioral science. We have no choice but to fully respect their autonomy. This methodology is intentionally designed to economically incentivize positive role models within IP and LC and enables them to self-reinforce traditional ways of life which conserve and retain knowledge of biodiversity in its fullest expression.

We remain hopeful and determined that this methodology will have the intended effect of strengthening the people with the biggest global impact on conserving biodiversity.

This methodology was . To date, leaders from eighteen and hundreds of in the Colombian Amazon have directly contributed to the design and piloting of this methodology. It is currently being considered for adoption by IP and LC groups in Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, Suriname, Mexico, Panama, Bolivia, Guatemala, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, the Philippines, Gabon, Kenya, South Africa, Uganda, Australia, New Zealand, the US, and Canada. It has been reviewed and refined and by hundreds of global experts using biological and anthropological considerations for biodiversity preservation, scientific understandings of complex adaptive systems, market needs for fungibility, and the urgency of minimizing further irreversible extinctions.

The Savimbo Team

co-developed with IP and LC
Indigenous communities
Indigenous smallfarmers
privately
publically
eco at savimbo.com
savimbo.com
80% of the conserved biodiversity
less than 2% of climate financing.
research
Cox et al. 2022
Rapacciuolo 2024
Rapacciuolo et al. 2019
chimpanzee for a jaguar
Figure 1. Data from ISBM biodiversity pilot site occuring over one year in the Colombian Amazon.
Page cover image