LogoLogo
Savimbo homepageBuy creditsSpanish
  • Executive summary
  • Front Material
    • Contents
    • Index of figures
    • Index of tables
    • Acronyms and abbreviations
    • Terms and definitions
  • Getting started
  • Introduction
    • The urgency of targeted biodiversity conservation
    • Simplicity, complexity theory, and biodiversity
    • Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and local communities by design
    • Biodiversity methodology benefits
  • Overall description
    • Objectives
    • Scope
    • Limitations
  • Project description
    • Principles
      • Principles of working with IP
    • Eligibility criteria
      • Land ownership and law
    • Additionality
    • Project boundaries
      • Spatial limits of the BCP
      • Temporal limits of the BCP
      • Grouped projects
    • Implementation plan
      • Measurement approaches
      • Indicator species observations
      • Risks and uncertainty
    • Effective participation
      • Community involvement
      • Capacity for action
      • Financial transparency
      • Safeguards checklist
  • Calculation
    • Unit calculations
    • Area calculations
    • Time calculations
    • Integrity calculations
    • Value calculations
  • Baseline assessment
    • Baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Analysis of agents and drivers of biodiversity loss
    • Baseline biodiversity (optional)
    • Baseline risk of biodiversity loss
    • Indicator species selection
    • Indicator species integrity score
  • SDG contributions
  • Monitoring plan
    • Monitoring report
    • Additional monitoring requirements
  • Authors
  • References
  • Appendices
    • Appendix A: Biodiversity methodologies comparison table
    • Appendix B: Sample legal proof of land control
    • Appendix C: Sample baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Appendix D: Species categorization of richness
    • Appendix E: Sample selection of indicator species
    • Appendix F: Sample indicator-species observations
    • Appendix G: Sample open-source code and calculation
    • Appendix H: Indigenous authors
    • Appendix I: Letters of support
      • Fernando Ayerbe, Ornithology
      • Ned Hording, Biodiversity
      • Olber Llanos, Zoologist
      • Mike McColm, Ethnology
      • Peter Thomas, Anthropologist
      • Jesús Argente, Marine biology
      • Sara Andreotti, Marine Biologist
      • Carolina Romero, Lawyer.
      • Daniel Urbano, Herpetologist
      • Ramesh Boonratana PhD, Primatologist
      • Theodore Schmitt, Conservationists
      • Anja Hutschenreiter, Ecologist and Tropical Conservationist
      • Miguel Chindoy, Indigenous leader
    • Appendix J: Sample uses of biodiversity unit
    • Appendix K: How to do FPIC
    • Appendix L: Independent Expert Panel Checklist
    • Appendix M: How to calculate a biodiversity credit by hand
    • Appendix N: How to calculate home ranges
    • Appendix O: How to calculate integrity scores
  • Document history
  • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • LinkedIn

About Savimbo

  • Science
  • Buy credits
  • About us
  • Donate

Indigenous authors

  • Jhony Lopez
  • Fernando Lezama
  • Blog

© 2023 Savimbo Inc. All rights reserved.

On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Appendices
  2. Appendix I: Letters of support

Ned Hording, Biodiversity

Letter of support from Ned Horning biodiversity expert

PreviousFernando Ayerbe, OrnithologyNextOlber Llanos, Zoologist

Last updated 12 months ago

Was this helpful?

Ned Horning Middlebury, Vermont USA nedhorning@gmail.com

Andrea (Drea) Burbank, MD CEO, Savimbo Inc. Carerra 6 - Numero #3-21, Villagarzon, Putumayo, Colombia

Re: Savimbo Sentinel species biodiversity methodology

Dear Dr. Burbank,

I am expressing my support for your proposed biodiversity methodology to use sentinel species as a metric of conserved biodiversity in tropical forests.

I am commenting from the perspective of an environmental remote sensing expert with 40 years of experience, with over half of that experience dedicated to research and support of biodiversity and biocultural diversity.

During my last two years working for Regen Network Development, PBC, I have worked on alternative approaches to traditional payment for ecosystem services schemes such as the carbon market. For the most part, existing financial schemes to support nature-based solutions are not accomplishing their goals nor adequately rewarding the stewards, often from Indigenous people and local communities, supporting ecosystem regeneration.

I support this methodology because its novel approach has a logical, simple framework based on common sense. It is scalable and can be applied in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Developing this methodology would be enormously beneficial, as it could benefit not only the Amazonian Piedmont area but any area where biodiversity is at risk and requires special care and attention.

Finally, it is of utmost importance to guarantee a means of subsistence to those people who live in these ecosystems so they continue their typically traditional, regenerative practices. For this reason, credits created from this methodology are a sensible and viable way to support regenerative practices to continue conserving and protecting the biodiversity of the forests and their livelihoods.

While many researchers have access to state of the art tools to quantify biodiversity, this methodology leverages proven state-of-the-practice methods to allow for suitable accuracy, transparency, and standardization between ecosystems and across many endangered species. It is based on robust scientific research on which a sound market could be built and enable the immediate preservation of threatened areas worldwide.

I am available to respond to requests for information and am happy to provide an independent voice for the validity of this methodology.

Respectfully,

Ned Horning

Consultant

Original letter of support Ned Horning, biodiversity expert