LogoLogo
Savimbo homepageBuy creditsSpanish
  • Executive summary
  • Front Material
    • Contents
    • Index of figures
    • Index of tables
    • Acronyms and abbreviations
    • Terms and definitions
  • Getting started
  • Introduction
    • The urgency of targeted biodiversity conservation
    • Simplicity, complexity theory, and biodiversity
    • Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and local communities by design
    • Biodiversity methodology benefits
  • Overall description
    • Objectives
    • Scope
    • Limitations
  • Project description
    • Principles
      • Principles of working with IP
    • Eligibility criteria
      • Land ownership and law
    • Additionality
    • Project boundaries
      • Spatial limits of the BCP
      • Temporal limits of the BCP
      • Grouped projects
    • Implementation plan
      • Measurement approaches
      • Indicator species observations
      • Risks and uncertainty
    • Effective participation
      • Community involvement
      • Capacity for action
      • Financial transparency
      • Safeguards checklist
  • Calculation
    • Unit calculations
    • Area calculations
    • Time calculations
    • Integrity calculations
    • Value calculations
  • Baseline assessment
    • Baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Analysis of agents and drivers of biodiversity loss
    • Baseline biodiversity (optional)
    • Baseline risk of biodiversity loss
    • Indicator species selection
    • Indicator species integrity score
  • SDG contributions
  • Monitoring plan
    • Monitoring report
    • Additional monitoring requirements
  • Authors
  • References
  • Appendices
    • Appendix A: Biodiversity methodologies comparison table
    • Appendix B: Sample legal proof of land control
    • Appendix C: Sample baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Appendix D: Species categorization of richness
    • Appendix E: Sample selection of indicator species
    • Appendix F: Sample indicator-species observations
    • Appendix G: Sample open-source code and calculation
    • Appendix H: Indigenous authors
    • Appendix I: Letters of support
      • Fernando Ayerbe, Ornithology
      • Ned Hording, Biodiversity
      • Olber Llanos, Zoologist
      • Mike McColm, Ethnology
      • Peter Thomas, Anthropologist
      • Jesús Argente, Marine biology
      • Sara Andreotti, Marine Biologist
      • Carolina Romero, Lawyer.
      • Daniel Urbano, Herpetologist
      • Ramesh Boonratana PhD, Primatologist
      • Theodore Schmitt, Conservationists
      • Anja Hutschenreiter, Ecologist and Tropical Conservationist
      • Miguel Chindoy, Indigenous leader
    • Appendix J: Sample uses of biodiversity unit
    • Appendix K: How to do FPIC
    • Appendix L: Independent Expert Panel Checklist
    • Appendix M: How to calculate a biodiversity credit by hand
    • Appendix N: How to calculate home ranges
    • Appendix O: How to calculate integrity scores
  • Document history
  • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • LinkedIn

About Savimbo

  • Science
  • Buy credits
  • About us
  • Donate

Indigenous authors

  • Jhony Lopez
  • Fernando Lezama
  • Blog

© 2023 Savimbo Inc. All rights reserved.

On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Calculation

Area calculations

Calculating biodiversity crediting area from observations of indicator species

PreviousUnit calculationsNextTime calculations

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

The full credited area for a BCP is dependent on the overlapping home ranges of the observed that lie within the — as determined by the union of individual observations within the same time frame.

Species are complex, dynamic, and diverse. Animals are typically observed at one geocode but have a far larger asymmetric habitat. For the purposes of simplification:

  • Each indicator species' publicly-accepted home range area is normalized to a circle around the central observation point where the species was verifiably observed. For details on this choice, see the . See an example list of home ranges in .

  • Identification of individuals of a species is NOT required by the ISBM. While it may be relatively easy to accomplish for an indicator species such as a jaguar (based on markings, or more invasively with an implanted radio chip), it becomes prohibitively difficult when taking into account the wide array of species that may qualify for indicator species within an ecosystem. Further, many identification and population calculation techniques are invasive, and/or technically exclusive to IP and LCs.

  • Observations are unioned. Because individual observations could be one, or many, individuals of an indicator species — if the same area contains more than one observation within a 60-day period the area is NOT double-credited, it is equated through a union of the home-range areas (see ). Thus the ISBM methodology remains conservation-only, as population growth may be difficult to prove—although it is acknowledged that more sophisticated methodologies may emerge to define and credit these areas.

A sample list of indicator species for Putumayo, Colombia with home ranges is provided in .

Figure 8. Union of multiple jaguar observations to calculate crediting area from home range

Figure 8a. Division of a crediting area by a grouped-project boundary

Please note that species observations involve one data layer. For BCPs with such as multiple adjoining land plots, grouped projects, or different segments, this layer might be split for calculations by another data layer.

project areas
qualifying indicator species
crediting area
FAQ
Appendix E
Time calculations
Appendix E
Page cover image