LogoLogo
Savimbo homepageBuy creditsSpanish
  • Executive summary
  • Front Material
    • Contents
    • Index of figures
    • Index of tables
    • Acronyms and abbreviations
    • Terms and definitions
  • Getting started
  • Introduction
    • The urgency of targeted biodiversity conservation
    • Simplicity, complexity theory, and biodiversity
    • Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and local communities by design
    • Biodiversity methodology benefits
  • Overall description
    • Objectives
    • Scope
    • Limitations
  • Project description
    • Principles
      • Principles of working with IP
    • Eligibility criteria
      • Land ownership and law
    • Additionality
    • Project boundaries
      • Spatial limits of the BCP
      • Temporal limits of the BCP
      • Grouped projects
    • Implementation plan
      • Measurement approaches
      • Indicator species observations
      • Risks and uncertainty
    • Effective participation
      • Community involvement
      • Capacity for action
      • Financial transparency
      • Safeguards checklist
  • Calculation
    • Unit calculations
    • Area calculations
    • Time calculations
    • Integrity calculations
    • Value calculations
  • Baseline assessment
    • Baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Analysis of agents and drivers of biodiversity loss
    • Baseline biodiversity (optional)
    • Baseline risk of biodiversity loss
    • Indicator species selection
    • Indicator species integrity score
  • SDG contributions
  • Monitoring plan
    • Monitoring report
    • Additional monitoring requirements
  • Authors
  • References
  • Appendices
    • Appendix A: Biodiversity methodologies comparison table
    • Appendix B: Sample legal proof of land control
    • Appendix C: Sample baseline ecosystem categorization
    • Appendix D: Species categorization of richness
    • Appendix E: Sample selection of indicator species
    • Appendix F: Sample indicator-species observations
    • Appendix G: Sample open-source code and calculation
    • Appendix H: Indigenous authors
    • Appendix I: Letters of support
      • Fernando Ayerbe, Ornithology
      • Ned Hording, Biodiversity
      • Olber Llanos, Zoologist
      • Mike McColm, Ethnology
      • Peter Thomas, Anthropologist
      • Jesús Argente, Marine biology
      • Sara Andreotti, Marine Biologist
      • Carolina Romero, Lawyer.
      • Daniel Urbano, Herpetologist
      • Ramesh Boonratana PhD, Primatologist
      • Theodore Schmitt, Conservationists
      • Anja Hutschenreiter, Ecologist and Tropical Conservationist
      • Miguel Chindoy, Indigenous leader
    • Appendix J: Sample uses of biodiversity unit
    • Appendix K: How to do FPIC
    • Appendix L: Independent Expert Panel Checklist
    • Appendix M: How to calculate a biodiversity credit by hand
    • Appendix N: How to calculate home ranges
    • Appendix O: How to calculate integrity scores
  • Document history
  • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • LinkedIn

About Savimbo

  • Science
  • Buy credits
  • About us
  • Donate

Indigenous authors

  • Jhony Lopez
  • Fernando Lezama
  • Blog

© 2023 Savimbo Inc. All rights reserved.

On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Appendices
  2. Appendix I: Letters of support

Fernando Ayerbe, Ornithology

Letter of support from Fernando Ayerbe, ornithologist

Fernando Ayerbe Quiñones Neiva, Huila Tel.: 3007365771 CEO Avifauna Colombiana

Andrea (Drea) Burbank, MD CEO, Savimbo Inc. Carrera 6 - Numero #3-21 Villagarzon, Putumayo, Colombia

Re: Savimbo Biodiversity Methodology Based on Sentinel Species

Dear Dr. Burbank,

I am writing to express my support for your proposed biodiversity methodology that utilizes sentinel species as a metric for measuring preserved biodiversity in tropical forests.

I come from the perspective of a biologist with experience in zoology, advocating for Indigenous knowledge for 15 years in various Colombian ecosystems, engaging in conservation efforts alongside rural communities and creating educational materials focused on these communities.

There is a critical need for regulation in markets/economy/science/research to support the traditional relationship between Indigenous cultures and the land, allowing for the protection of endangered or undiscovered biodiversity, plants, and medicine.

I support this methodology because it offers a simple and logical application, facilitates the transmission of traditional knowledge, and aligns with the traditional activities of hunters/gatherers. The development of this methodology could be highly beneficial, not only for the Amazon Piedmont region but also for any area where the role of Indigenous peoples as guardians of biodiversity is endangered and requires special care and attention.

It is essential that international markets focused on biodiversity provide a means of livelihood and empowerment for Indigenous peoples who have preserved their ecosystems. For this reason, biodiversity credits are a reasonable and viable way to generate non-hierarchical and decentralized employment in this population sector, which is focused on conserving and protecting forest biodiversity.

I am familiar with several aspects of the methodology that have been intentionally designed to ensure scientific coherence and market scalability while providing direct market access to Indigenous groups.

  • The methodology will allow for the use of trusted human coders for coordinates and date/time stamps of raw observation point data (video or audio recordings), relying on verification/validation bodies to validate this data.

  • The distribution area of sentinel species will be simplified to a circle with a documented observation point at the center, and the circle's area will be determined based on specific habitat requirements derived from public sources.

  • The methodology will classify rare/umbrella/key/endangered species into four levels (platinum, gold, silver, and bronze) based on their ability to represent a conserved biodiversity ecosystem.

  • Individual species identification or density calculations will not be performed. Individual observations will be equated if they occur within a 2-month timeframe and at the same geocoordinates.

The reference biodiversity will be calculated from public sources, sometimes for a much broader region, organized by taxonomic kingdom.

While many researchers have access to much broader scientific tools for quantifying biodiversity, this methodology is sufficient to allow for scientific accuracy, transparency, and standardization across ecosystems and among many different endangered species. Most importantly, it has been designed with traditional ways of life in mind and has been simplified to enable cultural translation and the preservation of traditional knowledge. I believe it establishes a solid standard upon which a robust market can be built, enabling immediate conservation of critical areas worldwide.

I am available to respond to information requests and willing to provide an independent voice regarding the validity of this methodology.

Respectfully,

Fernando Ayerbe Quiñones C.C.: 4617411 CEO Avifauna Colombiana

PreviousAppendix I: Letters of supportNextNed Hording, Biodiversity

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

Original letter of support Fernando Ayerbe, ornithologist